The brand new survey contained 3 bits. Part We included questions away from socio-group research (ages, level of knowledge, parity, familial earnings, job, newest relationship updates, sexual pastime, reputation for HPV inoculation, and you can reputation of irregular cervical cancer examination).

Region II made up of 6 questions relating to the goal ladies who are going to be screened, years first off, frequency, ages otherwise conditions to avoid of evaluation, and techniques regarding testing. Precisely the members who had ever heard away from HPV would go-ahead in order to Area III hence analyzed knowledge about HPV away from their particular (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), means from sign and prevention.

Before the data, the fresh new questionnaire from region II and you can part III within the Thai adaptation were contemplated, discussed, and you will modified up until consensus certainly 20 experts who had been all gynecologic oncologists (particular was indeed article authors in other parallel education). The pros rated each of 19 questions since either ‘relevant’ mГёde Ecuadoriansk kvinder otherwise ‘perhaps not relevant’. The object-top Articles Validity List (I-CVI) try determined per goods, and the Articles Validity List (CVI) was calculated by using the typical proportion out of fourteen questions about information about cervical malignant tumors assessment and you can 5 questions about HPV. The fresh CVI had been step 1 for elements of brand new survey (S1 Table). The newest accuracy is checked out into the 29 female with the exact same feature just like the players. The fresh Cronbach’ leader coefficients towards the accuracy was 0.819 having understanding of cervical cancer testing and you will 0.907 to possess knowledge about HPV.

Analysis range

Into the date from planned colposcopy, the study secretary provided pointers of the analysis towards the feminine who fulfilled introduction requirements. The women just who wanted to participate provided composed informed agree and answered the brand new survey by themselves by themselves in advance of proceeding to help you colposcopy.

Study gathered for it data was socio-demographic study (Area I of your questionnaire), experience in cervical cancer tumors tests (Region II), and you will expertise in HPV (Region III).

Analytical study

The new solutions of real information regarding cervical cancer tests and you may HPV were examined by the each goods in advance of rating categorization. Proper address try scored once the step 1 whereas ‘completely wrong and you will being unsure of answer’ is scored 0.

Out-of 14 inquiries away from cervical cancers tests, female whoever rating have been ? ten was basically arbitrarily categorized as that have ‘an excellent knowledge’ or else was regarded as which have “not-good studies”. To possess experience in HPV, feminine whose respond to is actually ‘never been aware of HPV’ have been excluded on the analysis away from HPV knowledge.

From 5 inquiries, feminine whoever score have been ? step 3 have been thought to be with ‘a good expertise in HPV’ if not since the ‘not good knowledge’. Out of 19 issues, women whoever score was ? 13 was indeed classified because which have ‘a good complete knowledge’ if not while the ‘unhealthy overall knowledge’.

All of the studies were compiled when you look at the an electronic digital database and you may reviewed using SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to research market study and was described as the number having payment, mean which have important departure or average with assortment. New organization anywhere between for each changeable and you can degree get have been reviewed having fun with easy linear regression. Exploratory model was made for the multivariable data and the variables potentially regarding the content score. New sensed number of analytical benefits is actually a great p-worth of 0.05 or faster.

Show

Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>